Wednesday, 12 March 2025

Trump is no longer influenced by stock markets



One top US tech chief executive told me on the day of the US presidential inauguration that although he is likely to face retaliatory tariffs, he thinks any trade war will cool down.


He said, "Trump goes by the reaction of the Dow Jones" - what the markets call the "Trump put".


That means that whenever the White House makes an announcement that hurts sentiment, the president backs down by seeing the stock market fall.


Those perceptions have now changed, after the president gave a TV interview in which he downplayed how much he is influenced by the markets.


And just a day after US stock markets fell sharply over concerns about the impact of Trump's policies, the president said he was going to double tariffs on steel and aluminum against Canada in response to higher fees for Canadian electricity worth about $100 per bill in New York, Minnesota and Michigan - although he later halted that plan after Ontario suspended those tariffs.


President Trump has said he is rebuilding wealth based on decades or even a century of time in the future, and that this cannot be measured in the quarterly results of America's stock market giants. With comments from his Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant, the White House was sending a message to markets that the president now has some tolerance for short-term market and economic pain. That has changed the calculus. There are two other factors at play here as well. There is evidence of a real potential reversal in US economic sentiment, raising questions about a recession. The most recent real-time analysis by the Atlanta branch of the US Federal Reserve predicts a contraction in the US economy in the first three months of the year. Government cuts may also contribute to such a reading, but private sector sentiment has also taken a hit, particularly from the hokey cokey on tariffs. Above all, uncertainty threatens to cripple. Policies change from day to day, and yet can be halted retrospectively. Key US government departments are not entirely clear about the direction of travel at the White House. To top it all, in the case of Canada, the likely election indicates little incentive to compromise.


Really, when Trump says he wants to use economic leverage to make his northern neighbour his "51st state", what compromise is there to be had?


The direction of travel here is for an increase in the intensity and scope of the trade war.


New trade barriers on the EU based on "reciprocity" could emerge in three weeks' time.


When other nations see signs of re-emerging inflation in the US, they will try to raise it further to convey to American consumers the consequences of their government's decisions.


Over the past fortnight the world has learned that President Trump is serious about tariffs, even on his own allies. They have been implemented en masse.


Key trading partners have responded in kind and have had incentive to move forward. And the White House now wants to show that it has a high pain threshold for short-term economic and market disruption.


All roads lead to April 2, and the announcement of "reciprocal tariffs," and for the moment these tensions are not leading to a truce, cease-fire or truce.

Double-kick penalty sees Atletico Madrid lose shootout



Real Madrid have Atletico's number in shootouts, having won against Atletico every time the derby has gone to penalties.


But defeat in the Champions League last 16 on Wednesday will be particularly disappointing for Diego Simeone's side.


Atletico midfielder Conor Gallagher's strike after 27 seconds had levelled the tie 2-2 on aggregate, but neither side could score a decisive goal in normal or extra time, forcing penalties to decide the result between the rivals for the sixth time in knockout games.


There, Real Madrid won 4-2 in dramatic and controversial fashion. Defender Antonio Rudiger scored the decisive penalty after scoring past Jan Oblak, but the hosts had Julian Alvarez's earlier effort denied in somewhat bizarre circumstances.


After successfully scoring the first three penalties, former Manchester City forward Alvarez created a chance to make the score 2-2. The Argentine international slipped while taking the shot, but still managed to beat Thibaut Courtois. Atletico fans were celebrating, but seconds before Fede Valverde scored Real's next penalty, Polish referee Szymon Marciniak signaled that Alvarez's spot-kick was ruled out due to interference from the Video Assistant Referee (VAR). A review of the incident showed that the forward touched the ball twice at once due to slipping while shooting. The scoreboard at the field showed 2-2 after Alvarez's attempt, which undoubtedly caused confusion in the stands, but at that point Real were actually leading 3-1. Although Atletico goalkeeper Oblak gave Atletico hope by saving Lucas Vazquez's spot-kick, Marcos Llorente hit the bar for the hosts and German Rudiger gave Real the win in a tense final.


What do the rules say?


Penalties are mentioned in Article 14.1 of the IFAB (International Football Association Board) code of play.


The rules say: "The kicker must not play the ball again until the ball has touched another player."


This is the same law that prevents people from scoring a rebound if their own penalty hits the post.


If the same happens from a penalty during regular play, the opposition will be awarded an indirect free-kick.


What was the reaction to this?


Atletico coach Simeone expressed doubts over the decision, but hoped the officials had made the right decision.


"The referee said that when Julian reached the penalty spot he touched the ball with his standing foot, but the ball didn't move," he said.


"I've never seen a penalty where they called VAR, but they must have seen that he touched the ball. I would like to believe that they saw that he touched the ball.


"Did you see him touch the ball twice? Please whoever was present in the stadium and saw him touch the ball twice, the ball moving, please come forward and raise your hand. I didn't see anyone raise their hand, so that's all I have to say... next question."


But Real Madrid coach Carlo Ancelotti was satisfied the right decision had been made.


"They figured it out. "When we thought it was doubtful, they had already detected it on VAR," he said.


"I saw it, I think he touched it with his left foot, it was a second touch."


Real Madrid goalkeeper Courtois admitted it was unfortunate for Atletico but the rules meant it was correctly disallowed.


He told Uefa.com: "I thought something strange was going on so we told the referee straight away and then it was confirmed there was a double touch and it didn't count, so obviously it gives us the edge.


"[Alvarez] slipped and he touched the ball twice and it's a missed penalty. You can't touch the ball twice. It's unfortunate but that's the rule." Former Newcastle and Republic of Ireland goalkeeper Shay Given said on BBC Match of the Day: "Sometimes you see it happen where the ball is kicked with the other foot and then goes in a completely different direction.


"Here the ball doesn't actually change direction but [Alvarez] kicks the ball with his [right] foot. The rules of the game are clear."


Has it happened before?

Yes - twice in the Premier League.


In 2017, Leicester's Riyad Mahrez joined them after he had a penalty disallowed for a similar offence during a 2-1 loss to Manchester City.


The Algerian winger slipped while taking the penalty and the ball struck his standing foot before going into the net.


"The shot was strange but the rule is clear. Two touches, just like in golf," said City manager Pep Guardiola at the time. "It's not normal." And in January 2023, Fulham striker Aleksandar Mitrovic did the same, accidentally hitting the ball onto his standing foot as he slipped while hitting it. The Cottagers lost the game 1-0 to his former club Newcastle. But later that year, a penalty was awarded in similar circumstances in the Scottish Premiership.